| Windows on Mac - which way to go |
 Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 7:50 pm |
 |
|
| kawee |
| Member |
|
| |
| Joined: 27 Mar 2017 |
| Posts: 2 |
| Location: Würzburg |
|
|
 |
|
|
| Hi,
I bought Ease with Aura a few weeks ago, installed it on my old Mac Mini (2.53, Intel Core Duo) running bootcamp/windows 7. Everything is working fine;-)) but slow....
To get things done faster I would like to work either - preferably - on my MacBook Pro (2.0 GHz i7 Quad-core, 15" Retina, 8 GB, 256 SSD) or on my trusty
"Musicmachine" Mac Pro (2 x 2.26 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon, 32 GB, lots of HDs for ProTools/Logic).
The internet is full of contradictive opinions about the speed and reliability of the different virtual systems like bootcamp, parallels, vm or virtual box.
Could anybody please share some hands-on experience with similar systems?
Thanx!
Klaus |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 8:30 am |
|
|
|
| Hi Klaus,
I use Ease and Aura on Mac with parallel desktop Win10.
My computer is a Mac i7 3.8 Ghz 8 cores with 16 GB of ram used only for calculations.
On this computer I was able to compare between a real Window 10 & a parallel desktop.
On large calculations (huge stadium type) I noticed an increase in calculation time of about 10 to 15%, in the worst case 20%. It's quite variable and difficult to quantify, but quite acceptable to me.
On smaller rooms (and lighter calculations), differences are, in my opinion, negligible. |
|
|
Last edited by Pierre-Antoine Sainz on Tue May 02, 2017 7:59 pm; edited 2 times in total
_________________
Regards,
Pierre-Antoine Sainz
France, Paris |
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue May 02, 2017 2:25 pm |
|
|
| kawee |
| Member |
|
| |
| Joined: 27 Mar 2017 |
| Posts: 2 |
| Location: Würzburg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AFMG Network Forum Index -> EASE 4 |
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
|
|
|
|
|
