Emad El-Saghir |
Member |
|
|
Joined: 27 Jun 2005 |
Posts: 8 |
Location: Cairo, Egypt |
|
|
 |
|
|
| Hi,
1. The difference between the two control times is the arrival time of the direct sound at the listener's seat.
2. For your second question, I will try to explain the issue as far as I understand it. If you consdider one source and one receiver in a given room, then the ray paths, which connect the two points and fulfill a preset reflection order and Snell's law of specular reflection, are deterministic and can be added by the program to the reflectogram if you allow for that through the cutoff criteria. Now, this time setting describes one of these criteria, namely the total travelling time of the ray path, and the impact chance is attributed to the total number of such deterministic ray paths. For a given number of rays per loudspeaker, if you choose a shorter time, then the ray paths that meet the reflection law and arrive at the receiver within that short time are less and shall represent mainly the first few orders of reflection, and that is why, it is more probable that they will be caught be the counting balloon. On the other hand, if you increase that time setting , you are now considering a larger number of ray paths with higher orders of reflection and the probability that the program will catch them for the same given number of rays per loudspeaker is less.
I hope this could be of any help to you.
Regards, |
|